The recent indignation of the representative AMD the fact that the cooperation of the creators Watch_dogs With NVIDIA allegedly harms the performance of drivers of competing companies, of course, could not pass by the latter. As a result, the chief engineer volunteered to clarify the situation NVIDIA Jam Jebenoyan (CEM CEBENOYAN).
First of all, the developer emphasized, they say, none of the Gam-Developers- Ubisoft Montreal Including – never forced to use a set of GameWorks tools. Just in the early stages of the project, guys from NVIDIA They visit the studio and tell the gagodel in detail what can be useful to them. Then the creative team thinks, and in the case of the consent of both sides, “iron” experts return for a week or two and do everything in their power so that the game looks cool on PC. And without stops exclusively on their own products.
Meanwhile AMD for some reason I am convinced that it is harmful NVIDIA It is maliciously prohibited by developers in the future to give access to the code of the finished game, and this, in turn, complicates the subsequent optimization of drivers and, accordingly, improve the quality of gameplay on computers where the video cards are installed the same AMD. Here Jebenoyan It becomes truly funny.
According to the director of the engineering department for technology development NVIDIA, The company has never forbidden anything in life friends-gamies. This is completely their product, which means, as they want, so let them dispose. Not to mention the fact that, in the opinion Jebenoyan, For successful optimization of drivers, most often this treasured source code is not required in principle.
Finally, the boss NVIDIA In the open allowed Ubisoft freely apply for advice to specialists from AMD, If those, of course, have some real ideas about how to make Watch_dogs More beautiful on their equipment.
May 29, 2014 Quantum Break will appear on screens in 2015
May 29, 2014 Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare will get to PS3 and PS4 by August
Watch_dogs
The best comments
Loll that? Nvidia in both directions?
1) G-Sync of course only on NVIDIA, https://playmillion-casino.co.uk/games/ of course only for $ 150. Made absolutely not inferior to the AMD analogue, included free of charge in the standard of the new version of the port of Display Port. But this G-Sync was PR markets as a manna heavenly sinners to the beekeepers to us.
2) Physx. Of course only for nvidia. Supports 2.5 games, including 2D platformers. Another marketing tool.
3) Hbao. Of course nVIDIA Only. Again continuous marketing, they say Uber-Super cool, in fact loses SSAO and HDAO (by the way AMD development).(here recently the blog came out where all this was painted)
4) Cuda. Onley Nvidia. Well, you can’t argue with Cuda, a wonderful thing. Of course, NVIDIA was not feasting for long, OpenCl was not long in coming, but what is what it is in abundance.
1) albeit not yet demanded (t.To. there are not enough capacities), but still TressFX technology open to everyone
2) the most brilliant mantle allowing developers to directly communicate with iron, bypassing the Sofvar layer. By the way, DirectX 12 uses the idea of Mantle, t.e. low -level access to the iron (there are rumors that Mantle was developed in a compartment with small -haired for Xbox One, well, why DX12 turns out just that, you can guess. If this is true of course).
3) HSA technology, there are no analogues like Mantle yet, and I think it is not expected in the near future.
Well, in general, AMD has always been a supporter of open software and development (well, not counting Manle, because well, it is very expensive to develop, share so stupid)
So I think AMD policy is much closer to users, well, in the iron market, it is still a certain corporation of good. Of course, now the processor segment has somehow been leaked (namely, the high-performance segment, FX 8350 will soon stop taking it out, and the receiver will only appear in 2016), but the shield will do it? The price policy is more loyal, at least a video card at a lower price is not inferior to a competitor (only there is no need about drivers, these problems were almost 10 years ago, but Pearl Funny, but no more).
But of course common sense solves, fanboy is very, very bad. For example, recently there was a deficit (about 3 months) AMD cards and prices took off, then only stupid would take AMD with a price of somewhere more than 4k wooden.
People do not go to marketing, that’s enough to eat shit, you are a buyer, not a consumer!
Having played in GTA5 on Sonya with her old card, and now in the dogs with R9 290 I realized that the iron does not solve.
AMD again (in fact, and when it was different?) Bark with the optimization of their firewood and O5 write off on the machinations of "green". I wonder what Nvidia did not cry when Tomb Rider came out specifically sharpened under AMD. They solved the problems normally and calmly and. Generally gets the impression that AMD compensates for their program misses for their cards. Take it cheaply! Well, bullshit that when a new game comes out, you will suffer with lags for a couple of weeks and wait for the update of firewood, but cheaper!
I don’t agree with the G-Sinc, he is really cool, because the performance does not fall when using it (which clearly cannot argue with AMD and the standard nonsense), but the smoothness of the picture rises (and at the same time the quality, just through this one, which is smooth). And $ 150 is not quite the correct price, because there are already monitors with support for this technology. I myself use it myself (especially what works is not an example of AMD technology, and at 120Hz; why not an example? Because AMD, above 60Hz, loses in smoothness).
Physics is also good, but only when it is inserted correctly. Example – mafia 2 and Borderland 2. But still, he is in many more games on the PC than two and a half.
HBAO+ is not inferior in speed, standard SSAO, but looks more beautiful. But yes, HDAO is much more beautiful, not to argue here.
And you forgot about one of the most fashionable features that the Nevidia presented – TXAA (which Temporal AA). IMHO, this is the most beautiful and fastest smoothing that is available at the moment.
IMHO, further discussion will not lead to anything, at least now. For soon should show GDDR6. And there it will already be necessary to discuss the speed of video cards with different technologies.
I always used NVIDIA cards and has never regretted it, I was always pleased with their product and support in games, I can’t say anything bad about AMD, because I did not buy cards of this company, but the NVIDIA competitor needs strong so that the prices in the competition for the consumer fell to us for joy.
Specialists from NVIDIA say the case, it is not for nothing that I subjectively prefer their products, despite the fact that there is practically no difference
Recently, just the same AMD has been working more with new projects. AMD Gaming Evolved is present in every second aa project. And Nvidia losing her positions decided to take meanness, which rightly outraged the representatives of the AMD. Get well)
I bought myself a computer 2 years ago with the processor with an intelligence of Nvidia Jixhifa Jixhfors last time updated last year, the question is why they are going well if all the games go, sorry for my friends who did not want to buy the same componition and buy percent and the video from the AMD now, the new game is constantly crying, something is not launched, but I did not say they, they didn’t get into the way. Marketing, and got what they wanted.
Tob you is essentially Shadowplay from Nvidia. Yes, it works more with new projects, you generally see the difference when one office is directly trying to improve graphics in games?, Stop comparing the ass with your finger.
You at least 1 example Positive recall "Excuses of expensive iron". Physx in 5 games and working in 1 stream? G-Sync, requiring a bunch of difficulties and expensive controller? 3D, pushing FPS, killing eyes and requiring special devices? Not not – Fuflo is all